tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14311740.post1065163401636724020..comments2008-02-26T13:57:34.300-08:00Alanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00999861302655014098noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14311740.post-28602459830589665212008-02-26T13:57:00.000-08:002008-02-26T13:57:00.000-08:00That's a great setup. I'm looking for exactly the same setup; with DSPAM scanning the MISSED and NotSpam folders to correct itself.<BR/><BR/>Could you please post your script somewhere here? Thanks!Jellehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03991406904064264008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14311740.post-72413086134033520002007-02-16T11:44:00.000-08:002007-02-16T11:44:00.000-08:00Awesome! Long as the users keep sorting, it'll keep getting better.<BR/><BR/>I've been finding that the spam that comes around SpamAssassin definitely comes in waves. We're in a high bypass section of the wave right now, but I just keep flagging the spam and it gets better pretty quickly on my webmail account. DSpam's currently running on that account as a sort of backup and it catches the majority of the stuff that SpamAssassin misses, but occasionally (maybe 1 in 500, very good, actually) nabs some ham. So it goes...<BR/><BR/>HATE spam hate hate.Branthttp://powdertoast.livejournal.comnoreply@blogger.com